I don’t have a deep history of John K, but of course as an animation major I respect his conviction. There was one post for me that always sat wrong and I could never shake the sourness it gave me, and it was that old “Are These Politically Correct?” blog from 2009. I remember at the time we were watching song of the south in the “forbidden animation” portion of our history of animation class, and as the only black kid in my program at the time, a lot runs through your head about the industry and the history of it.
What soured me about the post is it seemed to have no indication of thought, a sort of “talk among yourselves” posts that only seems to say “Well I only care about animation and DESIGN, so I don’t actually have to discuss the dubious topic of race.” But then, at the end of the post was a picture with two teens with their paints hanging down, as if the period on a sentence about….? I’m not sure. I know that at that point, I also looked at his female characters a lot more critically.
You may have a view point, or context, since you seemed pretty well versed in his history. Was there some context I missed?
My stance on the old cartoons is to view them and to understand their context, and ultimately enjoy them for what they are. But I still need guys like John K to take the conversation on sexism and race seriously in the modern age if they are going to contribute to the medium. A criticism that hes always seemed pretty defensive and deaf to (from my limited experience). Its sad, because I would love to see more variety between the total rainbow of races and gender and body type, and an unyielding death grip on old aesthetics with problematic depictions.